HALL v. DAWSON et al.

Filing 76

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 75 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant White is DISMISSED from this action based on Plaintiff's failure to effect timely service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and/or for his failur e to comply with an order of the court. All other defendants having been dismissed by previous order (doc. 74 ), the clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice." Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 6/14/2017. (tdl)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION AUBREY HALL, Plaintiff, v. 5:15cv27–WS/CJK DAWSON, et al., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 75) docketed May 15, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that Robert White be dismissed from this action due to Plaintiff’s failure to effect timely service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and/or for his failure to comply with an order of the court. No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Page 2 of 2 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 75) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Defendant White is DISMISSED from this action based on Plaintiff’s failure to effect timely service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and/or for his failure to comply with an order of the court. 3. All other defendants having been dismissed by previous order (doc. 74), the clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice.” DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of June , 2017. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?