COX v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The magistrate judges report and recommendation (doc. 4 ) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. The plaintiff's complaint and this actio n are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal is without prejudice to refiling in an appropriate forum. The clerk shall enter judgment. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 5/12/15. (amm)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
THOMAS R. COX,
Plaintiff,
v.
5:15cv61-WS-GRJ
STATE OF INDIANA, and
INDIANA BUREAU OF MOTOR
VEHICLES,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.
4) docketed April 8, 2015. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's
case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction motion and for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the
report and recommendation.
Page 2 of 2
The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate
judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 4) is hereby
ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. The dismissal is without prejudice to refiling in an
appropriate forum.
3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are dismissed without
prejudice.”
DONE AND ORDERED this
12th
day of
May
, 2015.
s/ William Stafford
WILLIAM STAFFORD
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?