PAVAO v. JENKINS et al

Filing 99

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 74 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 93 ) is ADOPTED and incorporated into this order. All claims against all Defendants Leslie and Thom as are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' claim against the "officer who escorted plaintiff to medical" is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed." The case shall be closed. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 2/22/2018. (tdl)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION JOHN PAVAO, Plaintiff, v. 5:15cv67–WS/CJK CARLTON LESLIE, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 93) docketed November 15, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 74) be granted. Plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 98) to the report and recommendation. Having considered the record in light of Plaintiff’s objections, the court finds that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due to be granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 93) is ADOPTED and incorporated into this order. Page 2 of 2 2. The motion for summary judgment (doc. 74) filed by Carlton Leslie and Antonio Thomas is GRANTED. 3. All claims against all Defendants Leslie and Thomas are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. Plaintiffs’ claim against the “officer who escorted plaintiff to medical” is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are dismissed.” 6. The case shall be closed. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of February , 2018. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?