COLLINS v. PALMER
Filing
23
ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 3/28/2017. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment which states as follows: "ECF No. 1 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Shaka Jamar Collins, Bay County Circuit Court Case No. 09-CF-1852, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED." The Clerk is directed to close the file. (kdm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
SHAKA JAMAR COLLINS,
PETITIONER,
-vs-
Case No. 5:16-cv-00026-WTH-CJK
JOHN PALMER, Warden of Florida State
Prison,
RESPONDENT.
______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation dated February 6, 2017. (ECF No. 22). The parties have
been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been
afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States
Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none
have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined
that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. The Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 22, is adopted and incorporated
by reference in this order. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment which states
as follows: “ECF No. 1, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging
petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Shaka
Page 2 of 2
Jamar Collins, Bay County Circuit Court Case No. 09-CF-1852, is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk is
directed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 28th day of March, 2017.
Copies to:
Case No: 5:16-cv-00026-WTH-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?