COLLINS v. PALMER

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 3/28/2017. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment which states as follows: "ECF No. 1 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Shaka Jamar Collins, Bay County Circuit Court Case No. 09-CF-1852, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED." The Clerk is directed to close the file. (kdm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION SHAKA JAMAR COLLINS, PETITIONER, -vs- Case No. 5:16-cv-00026-WTH-CJK JOHN PALMER, Warden of Florida State Prison, RESPONDENT. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 6, 2017. (ECF No. 22). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 22, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment which states as follows: “ECF No. 1, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging petitioner's judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Shaka Page 2 of 2 Jamar Collins, Bay County Circuit Court Case No. 09-CF-1852, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk is directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 28th day of March, 2017. Copies to: Case No: 5:16-cv-00026-WTH-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?