SAWIKI v. JONES
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: "The petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1), challenging petitioner's judgment and sentence in State of Florid a v. Kristina Marie Sawiki, Bay County Circuit Court Case Nos. 14-CF-539, 14-CF-2185 and 14-CF-2655, is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied." The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 3/12/2018. (atm)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
KRISTINA SAWIKI,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 5:16-cv-00032-WTH-CJK
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY,
Respondent.
_____________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation. (ECF No. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time
for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that
the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
2.
The Clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: “The petition
for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1), challenging petitioner's
judgment and sentence in State of Florida v. Kristina Marie Sawiki,
Bay County Circuit Court Case Nos. 14-CF-539, 14-CF-2185 and
14-CF-2655, is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied.” The
Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of March, 2018
Case No: 5:16-cv-00032-WTH-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?