WALKER v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 Report and Recommendation.. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this Court. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 8/10/17. (bkp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION JEFFREY JEROME WALKER, PETITIONER, -vs- Case No. 5:16-cv-00214-WTH-GRJ FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, JULIE L JONES, RESPONDENTS. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 6. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. The petitioner was directed by the Magistrate Judge to file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis but failed to do so by the deadline, so the Magistrate Judge ordered petitioner to show cause why the case should not be dismissed. ECF No. 5. Petitioner did not do so by the deadline, and the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation that the case be dismissed. ECF No. 6. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 6, is accepted and incorporated herein. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment which states: “This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this Court.” The Clerk is directed to close the file. DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 10th day of August, 2017. Case No: 5:16-cv-00214-WTH-GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?