WALKER v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 Report and Recommendation.. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this Court. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 8/10/17. (bkp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
JEFFREY JEROME WALKER,
PETITIONER,
-vs-
Case No. 5:16-cv-00214-WTH-GRJ
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, JULIE L JONES,
RESPONDENTS.
______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, ECF No. 6. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report
and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing
objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and
Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted. The petitioner was directed by the Magistrate Judge to file an application for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis but failed to do so by the deadline, so the
Magistrate Judge ordered petitioner to show cause why the case should not be
dismissed. ECF No. 5. Petitioner did not do so by the deadline, and the Magistrate
Judge entered a Report and Recommendation that the case be dismissed. ECF No. 6.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 6, is
accepted and incorporated herein. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment which
states: “This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to
comply with an order of this Court.” The Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 10th day of August, 2017.
Case No: 5:16-cv-00214-WTH-GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?