TEMPLE v. JONES

Filing 7

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's 3 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED as petitioner's anticipated § 2254 should be filed in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 2/13/2017. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ROBERT G. TEMPLE, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5:16cv341/LC/CJK JULIE JONES, Respondent. ___________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated January 24, 2017. (Doc. 4). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection (doc 6) has been made. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) is adopted Page 2 of 2 and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Petitioner’s motion for extension of time (doc. 3) is DENIED. 3. This case is DISMISSED, as petitioner’s anticipated § 2254 petition directed at his Pinellas County criminal judgment should be filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. ORDERED on this 13th day of February, 2017. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 5:16cv341/LC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?