STANG v. MADDOX
Filing
7
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 5 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious for plaintiffs abuse of the judicial process. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 4/3/2017. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
MICHAEL STANG,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 5:17cv51-MCR-CJK
MADDOX, et al.,
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated March 2, 2017. ECF No. 5. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation
should be adopted.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious for plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process.
3.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of April, 2017.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 5:17cv51-MCR-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?