RYAN v. POYTHESS

Filing 45

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint (doc. 35 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against de fendant Newman is DISMISSED. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Poythress and Alvarez. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 08/29/2018. (MB)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION TAYLOR AUSTIN RYAN, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:17cv54-MCR-CJK GREGG POYTHRES, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 12, 2018. ECF No. 43. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Page 2 of 2 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint (doc. 35) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 3. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Newman is DISMISSED. 4. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Poythress and Alvarez. DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of August 2018. M. Casey Rodgers s/ M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 5:17cv54-MCR-CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?