JACKSON v. JONES
ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 21 , is GRANTED. Petitioner's § 2254 petition, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 03/12/2018. (MB)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
MICHAEL F. JACKSON,
CASE NO. 5:17cv66/MCR/EMT
JULIE L. JONES,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated February 5, 2018. ECF No. 25. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED.
Petitioner’s § 2254 petition, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).
A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of March 2018.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 5:17cv66/MCR/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?