JACKSON v. JONES

Filing 28

ORDER adopting Chief Magistrate Judge's 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 21 , is GRANTED. Petitioner's § 2254 petition, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 03/12/2018. (MB)

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL F. JACKSON,
Petitioner,
v.

CASE NO. 5:17cv66/MCR/EMT

JULIE L. JONES,
Respondent.
_______________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated February 5, 2018. ECF No. 25. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.

Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED.

3.

Petitioner’s § 2254 petition, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).
4.

A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of March 2018.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 5:17cv66/MCR/EMT