ROGERS v. TATE

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 12 MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Recall Opinion and Reopen Case, construed as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to FED.R.Civ. P. 60(b), is DENIED. Plaintiff's 13 Motion for transport and 16 Motion to Recall Opinion and Reopen Case are DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/8/2018. (alb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION JESSE ELIJAH ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 5:17cv161-MCR-GRJ SHERIFF JOHN TATE, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated January 10, 2018. ECF No. 12. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. Plaintiff’s “motion to recall opinion and reopen case”, construed as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), ECF No. 10, is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Transport, ECF No. 13, and restated Motion to Recall Opinion and Reopen Case, ECF. No. 16, are DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of February 2018. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 5:17cv161-MCR-GRJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?