ROGERS v. TATE
ORDER ADOPTING 12 MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Recall Opinion and Reopen Case, construed as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to FED.R.Civ. P. 60(b), is DENIED. Plaintiff's 13 Motion for transport and 16 Motion to Recall Opinion and Reopen Case are DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 2/8/2018. (alb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
JESSE ELIJAH ROGERS,
CASE NO. 5:17cv161-MCR-GRJ
SHERIFF JOHN TATE,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated January 10, 2018. ECF No. 12. The parties have been
afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,
Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
Plaintiff’s “motion to recall opinion and reopen case”, construed as a
motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), ECF No. 10, is
Plaintiff’s Motion for Transport, ECF No. 13, and restated Motion to
Recall Opinion and Reopen Case, ECF. No. 16, are DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of February 2018.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 5:17cv161-MCR-GRJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?