MANHARD v. PANAMA CITY BEACH
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to plaintiff's failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/12/2017. (MB)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
KENNETH LEE MANHARD,
CASE NO. 5:17cv206-MCR-CJK
PANAMA CITY BEACH, et al.,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated September 11, 2017. ECF No. 8. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to
plaintiff’s failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2017.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 5:17cv206-MCR-CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?