JONES v. SCHWARZ et al
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/8/2018. (sdw)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
KEVIN JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 5:17cv239/MCR/EMT
WILLIAM J. SCHWARZ,
Defendant.
_________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated April 9, 2018. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff has been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have
made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.
Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant
to and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and
3.
Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of May 2018.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 5:17cv239/MCR/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?