BARTLETT v. WARDEN
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, because it is moot. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 8/16/2018. (sdw)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
JON BARTLETT,
Petitioner,
v.
CASE NO. 5:18cv49-MCR-EMT
WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA,
Respondent.
__________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report
and Recommendation dated July 19, 2018. ECF No. 13. The parties have been
furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should
be adopted.
Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241,
ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, because it is moot.
3.
The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of August 2018.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 5:18cv49-MCR-EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?