PUGH v. JONES
ORDER adopting 65 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 42 , 59 ) are GRANTED. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 09/14/2020. (alb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
D’ANGELO J. PUGH,
Case No. 5:18cv117-TKW-MJF
MARK S. INCH, et al.,
This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 65). No objections were filed.1 Upon due consideration of
the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the
magistrate judge’s determination that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment
are due to be granted. Accordingly, it is
The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by
reference in this Order.
The Court did not overlook the “Delayed Response do [sic] to Circumstances beyond
Plaintiff’s Control” (Doc. 66) that was received after the Report and Recommendation was entered,
but that filing appears to be a response to Defendant Mercer’s motion for summary judgment (Doc.
59), not objections to the Report and Recommendation. Nothing in that filing undermines the
magistrate judge’s analysis or recommended disposition of Defendants’ motions.
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. 42, 59) are
The Clerk shall enter judgment for Defendants and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED this 14th day of September, 2020.
T. Kent Wetherell, II
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?