PALMER v. JONES
Filing
32
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The amended petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the conviction in State v. Palmer, 2013-CF-2870, in the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Bay County, Florida, ECF Doc. 5 , is DENIED without an evidentiary hearing. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/4/2021. (mb)
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
THOMAS MICHAEL PALMER,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 5:19cv2-MCR-HTC
MARK S. INCH,
Respondent.
_________________________/
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the magistrate judge’s
Report and Recommendation dated July 1, 2021 (ECF No. 26). Plaintiff was
furnished with a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an
opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section
636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. See
ECF No. 31.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and any duly filed
objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
(1) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 26), is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
(2) The amended petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the conviction
in State v. Palmer, 2013-CF-2870, in the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit, in
and for Bay County, Florida, ECF Doc. 5, is DENIED without an
evidentiary hearing.
(3) A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
(4) The Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of October 2021.
s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No. 5:19cv2-MCR-HTC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?