VASQUEZ v. BISHOP et al
Filing
17
ORDER the magistrate judge's 13 Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. The claims against Defendants Colon, Love, Mendez, Corrales, and Keaton are DISMISSED. This case is recommitted to the magistrate judge to address Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendant Bishop. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 02/16/2021. (alb)
Case 5:20-cv-00134-TKW-MJF Document 17 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
EDUARDO VASQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 5:20-cv-134-TKW/MJF
K. BISHOP, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 13). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of
the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the
magistrate judge’s determination that the claims against Defendants Colon, Love,
Mendez, Corrales, and Keaton should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1) based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted against those defendants.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
The claims against Defendants Colon, Love, Mendez, Corrales, and
Keaton are DISMISSED.
Case 5:20-cv-00134-TKW-MJF Document 17 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 2
3.
This case is recommitted to the magistrate judge to address Plaintiff’s
remaining claims against Defendant Bishop.
DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of February, 2021.
T. Kent Wetherell, II
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?