DICK v. SMITH et al
Filing
23
ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial process. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and closethe case file. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 9/7/2021. (jcw)
Case 5:20-cv-00150-TKW-MJF Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
ROBERT DICK,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 5:20-cv-150-TKW/MJF
ROBIN SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 22). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of
the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the
magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on
Plaintiff’s failure to completely and honestly disclose his litigation history.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial
process.
Case 5:20-cv-00150-TKW-MJF Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2
3.
The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close
the case file.
DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2021.
T. Kent Wetherell, II
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?