DICK v. SMITH et al

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial process. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and closethe case file. Signed by JUDGE T KENT WETHERELL II on 9/7/2021. (jcw)

Download PDF
Case 5:20-cv-00150-TKW-MJF Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ROBERT DICK, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:20-cv-150-TKW/MJF ROBIN SMITH, et al., Defendants. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to completely and honestly disclose his litigation history. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial process. Case 5:20-cv-00150-TKW-MJF Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2021. T. Kent Wetherell, II T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?