SWEET v. DIXON

Filing 11

ORDER. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8 ) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. The 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition (Doc. #1 ) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because it is a second or successive petition that was filed without the Eleventh Circuit's permission. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 09/25/24. (jfj)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION ERIC DEVON SWEET, Petitioner, vs. Case No.: 5:24cv164/MCR/ZCB RICKY D. DIXON, Respondent. _________________________/ ORDER The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 19, 2024. (Doc. 8). The Court furnished the petitioner a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 1 2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction because it is a second or successive petition that was filed without the Eleventh Circuit’s permission. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of September 2024. M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?