F & G Research, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
Filing
8
AGREED MOTION by F & G Research, Inc. (Attorney ) to extend time to file the joint scheduling report (Former Deputy Clerk)
F & G Research, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
Doc. 8
Case 0:06-cv-60905-CMA
Document 8
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006
Page 1 of 4 Jul 26 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 06-60905-CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff
F & G RESEARCH, INC., Plaintiff, vs.
GOOGLE INC., Defendant.
PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT TO FILE THE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT Plaintiff, F & G Research, Inc. ("F&G"), by and through its undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7.1.A.1, Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, hereby petitions this Court for an enlargement of six (6) weeks for the parties to file the joint scheduling report no later than September 13, 2006, and in support states as follows: 1. The parties are currently required to prepare and file a joint scheduling report as
required by Local Rule 16.1, on or before August 2, 2006. 2. The Amended Complaint was filed and served on July 6, 2006, and Google is
required to respond no later than July 26, 2006. 3. However, Plaintiff filed an agreed motion for enlargement for Google to respond to
the Amended Complaint by August 26, 2006, which is currently pending before this Court.
1
1 of 4
8pa Dockets.Justia.com
Case 0:06-cv-60905-CMA
Document 8
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006
Page 2 of 4
4.
Google has not made an appearance in this action and does not foresee making an
appearance before August 2, 2006, should the Court grant the agreed motion for enlargement to answer by August 26, 2006. 5. Accordingly, Plaintiff hereby requests this Court grant an enlargement of time for
the parties to file the joint scheduling report no later than September 13, 2006, which the parties feel will give them ample time to effectively plan a proposed scheduling report after Google's response the Amended Complaint. 6. The undersigned counsel certifies that Google is in agreement with the remedies
being sought and that this motion is made in good faith and not as a dilatory tactic. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this Court grant the instant motion.
Dated: July 26, 2006 Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Allen D. Brufsky Allen D. Brufsky, Esq. Florida Bar Number 133980 abrufsky@cwiplaw.com CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A. 200 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 2040 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 828-1488 Facsimile: (954) 828-9122 Attorneys for Plaintiff, F & G Research, Inc.
.
2
2 of 4
Case 0:06-cv-60905-CMA
Document 8
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006
Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT TO FILE THE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT is being deposited with the United States Postal Service in First Class postage-paid envelopes this 26th , day of July, 2006, addressed to: Michelle Lee, Esq. Catherine Lacavera, Esq. GOOGLE INC. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, California 94043
/s/ Allen D. Brufsky Allen D. Brufsky, Esq.
58493
3
3 of 4
Case 0:06-cv-60905-CMA
Document 8
Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006
Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 06-60905-CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff
F & G RESEARCH, INC., Plaintiff, vs.
GOOGLE INC., Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENTTO FILE THE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Agreed Motion for Enlargement to File the Joint Scheduling Report filed on July 26, 2006, and the Court being otherwise advised in the premises, it is, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said motion is GRANTED. The parties shall file the Joint Scheduling Report as required by Local Rule 16.1, on or before September 13, 2006. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ____, day of July, 2006.
CECILIA M. ALTONAGA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies provided to: All counsels of record
1
4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?