Monelus v. Tocodrian, Inc.
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendations re 48 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion for Taxation of Costs.. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 4/22/2009. (ail)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 07-61801-CIV-DIMITROULEAS CESAR MONELUS, and others similarly situated, Magistrate Judge Rosenbaum Plaintiff, vs. TOCODRIAN, INC. d/b/a SUN FISH GRILL, Defendant. ____________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING MOTION IN PART THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Rosenbaum on March 31, 2009. [DE-48]. The Court notes that no objections to the Reports have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge's factual findings in the Report and Recommendation are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1) The Report and Recommendation [DE-48] is hereby ADOPTED. 2) Defendant's Verified Motion to Tax Costs [DE-44] is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
3) Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay Defendant's costs in the amount of $1074.64, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of 0.50%, accruing as of December 16, 2008, the date of the original Final Judgment for Defendant [DE-41]. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 22nd day of April, 2009.
Copies furnished to: Magistrate Rosenbaum Cesar Monelus, pro se 5962 N.W. 20th Street Lauderhill, FL 33308 Sloan Carr, Esq. Chris Kleppin, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?