Williams v. R.W. Cannon, Inc. et al

Filing 176

ORDER granting 172 Plaintiff's Request to Compel Post-Judgment Discovery. By November 16, 2009, each Defendant shall complete under oath, Fla.R.Civ.P. Form 1.977, including all required attachments, and serve it on Plaintiff's attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 10/1/2009. (dlt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-60168-CIV-UNGARO/SIMONTON CONSENT CASE JAMES WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. R.W. CANNON, INC., a Florida Corporation d/b/a INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS OF COASTAL FLORIDA, and ROBERT W. CANNON, individually, Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO COMPEL POST-JUDGMENT DISCOVERY Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment For Attorneys' Fees and Costs (DE # 172). In this motion, inter alia, Plaintiff asks this Court to order Defendants to complete within 45 days of the entry of the final judgment, under oath, Fla.R.Civ.P. Form 1.977, including all required attachments. Defendants have not filed a response and the last day to timely file a response was September 28, 2009. On September 30, 2009, the undersigned entered a Final Judgment on Attorney's Fees and Costs against Defendants, jointly and severally. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 C., it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Request To Compel Post-Judgment Discovery (DE # 172), is GRANTED by default. On or before November 16, 2009, Defendants R.W. Cannon, Inc. and Robert W. Cannon shall each complete, under oath, Fla.R.Civ.P. Form 1.977, including all required attachments, and serve it on Plaintiff's attorney. Defendants are placed on notice that failure to obey this order may be considered contempt of court. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida on October 1, 2009. ANDREA M. SIMONTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished via CM/ECF to: All counsel of record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?