Berg v. Merchants Association Collection Division, Inc.
ORDER denying as moot 28 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 28 Motion for Sanctions, in light of 33 Defendant's Notice of Withdrawal. Please see Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum on 12/31/2008. (RSR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-60660-CIV-DIMITROULEAS/ROSENBAUM
THOMAS E. BERG, JR., Plaintiff, v. MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION COLLECTION DIVISION, INC., d/b/a MAF Collection Services, Defendant. /
ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion to Compel Disclosure Under Rule 26 and Motion for Sanctions Under Rule 37 [D.E. 28]. In view of Defendant's Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Compel Disclosure and for Appropriate Sanctions [D.E. 33], which states that the parties have resolved the issue that constituted the subject of Defendant's Motion to Compel Disclosure and Motion for Sanctions [D.E. 28], it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to Compel Disclosure Under Rule 26 and Motion for Sanctions Under Rule 37 [D.E. 28] is DENIED AS MOOT. DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of December, 2008.
ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE cc: Hon. William P. Dimitrouleas Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?