Nicholas v. Bronson & MIgliaccio, LLP. et al

Filing 61

ORDER granting 54 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 3/16/2012. (dkc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 09-60925-CIV-GOLD/GOODMAN
PATRICIA L. NICHOLAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRONSON & MIGLIACCIO, LLP,
Defendant.
_______________________________/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery. [ECF No. 54].
During the March 16, 2012 discovery hearing held on this motion, Defendant’s corporate
representative, Patrick Bergmann, stated that Defendant (or its successor law firm) would today
mail responses to the discovery at issue in the motion to compel. Mr. Bergmann also stated that
Defendant would provide substantive responses and relevant documents and would not object to
any of the discovery requests. 1
Consequently, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s motion to
compel is GRANTED. Defendant shall today mail its responses to the discovery at issue in the
motion to compel, as its corporate representative stated it would do.
DONE and ORDERED, in Chambers, at Miami, Florida this 16th day of March, 2012.

Copies furnished to:
The Honorable Alan S. Gold
United States District Judge
All counsel of record
1

Mr. Bergmann also stated that he was an attorney admitted in New York and New Jersey
and was making all representations to the court in his other capacity as an attorney.