Smith v. Pearson et al
Filing
9
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 7 Report and Recommendations. and Dismissing Defendant Lamberti. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 4/13/2011. (ots)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 11-60165-CIV-COHN/WHITE
RONALD SMITH,
Plaintiff,
vs.
GLEN PEARSON, et. al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING
DEFENDANT LAMBERTI
This matter is before the Court on the Report of Magistrate Judge [DE 7]
(“Report”). Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report and the time for filing
objections has passed. The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and is otherwise
fully advised in the premises.
Plaintiff names the following individuals as defendants in this action: (1) Glen
Pearson, a dentist; (2) Natalie Smith, a registered nurse; (3) Karen Davis, Vice
President of Armor Correctional Health Care, Inc.; and (4) Sheriff Alfred Lamberti.
Plaintiff alleges that he was seen by Dr. Pearson sometime in 2007 at the Broward
County Main Jail. Dr. Pearson diagnosed Plaintiff with bleeding gums and loose
teeth. Dr. Pearson therefore prescribed antibiotics to Plaintiff, but told Plaintiff that he
could not clean Plaintiff’s teeth until Plaintiff was held at the Broward County Jail for a
period of one year. Dr. Pearson informed Plaintiff that no prosthetic services were
provided for detainees at the facility.
In December of 2008, Plaintiff submitted a grievance, claiming the denial of
partial dentures by Dr. Pearson. Defendant Smith responded to Plaintiff’s grievance.
Plaintiff claims Smith falsified the official document by stating that he had no trouble
eating. Plaintiff submitted a writ of habeas corpus to the state court, and in March of
2008, Broward County Jail was ordered that he be seen by a dentist within thirty days
and receive treatment. In October of 2010, a hearing was held with Broward County
Jail and Armor Health Care, represented by Defendant Karen Davis. The parties
refused to have Plaintiff fitted for dentures. In November of 2010, Plaintiff had a
recurrent gum infection and Dr. Pearson prescribed antibiotics. Dr. Pearson informed
Plaintiff that he would be scheduled for a cleaning of the teeth remaining in his mouth.
Plaintiff submitted sick call requests to be seen before his gums became infected. Dr.
Pearson cleaned his teeth in December of 2010, but refused to prescribe pain
medication or antibiotics. As a result of this delayed and poor treatment he claims he
suffered pain, lost most of his teeth, and is able to eat only soft food. Based upon
these allegations, Judge White determined that Plaintiff has stated a claim for denial of
adequate medical attention against Defendants Pearson, Smith, and Davis.
However, Judge White also determined that Plaintiff failed to state a claim
against Defendant Lamberti. Plaintiff’s Complaint makes no specific allegations against
Defendant Lamberti. Because public officials in supervisory positions cannot be held
vicariously liable for the acts of their subordinates, see Byrd v. Clark, 783 F.2d 1002,
1008 (11th Cir. 1986), and liability in a section 1983 action cannot be predicated solely
upon the doctrine of respondeat superior, see Monell v. Dep’t of Social Servs., 436 U.S.
658 (1978), Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against Defendant Lamberti.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Report, it is ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED as follows:
1.
Judge White’s Report [DE 17] is ADOPTED.
2.
The claim against Defendant Lamberti in Plaintiff’s Complaint [DE 1] is
DISMISSED.
3.
Service will be ordered on the remaining defendants
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County,
Florida, this 13th day of April, 2011.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?