Mitchell v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline et al

Filing 4

ORDER granting 3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; granting 3 Unopposed Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 5/5/2011. (prd)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-60941-CIV-COHN/SELTZER JOYCE MITCHELL, Plaintiff, vs. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD., GLAXOSMITHKLINE UK LTD., and WAL-MART STORES, INC. Defendants. _______________________________________/ ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS This cause is before the Court on Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC’s Unopposed Motion to Stay of Proceedings and Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint [DE 3]. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is fully advised in the premises. Defendant seeks to stay this action pending a decision by Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation whether to transfer this action to the MDL Court. Numerous other actions have been transferred to the MDL Court. The present request for relief is unopposed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. GlaxoSmithKline LLC’s Unopposed Motion to Stay of Proceedings and Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint [DE 3] is hereby GRANTED; 2. This case is STAYED, until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation enters an order regarding transfer of this action, or until further order of this Court; 3. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes, and any pending motions shall be TERMINATED for statistical purposes; 4. Defendant’s counsel shall immediately forward to this Court any orders from the MDL panel regarding transfer of this action. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 5th day of May, 2011. copies to: counsel of record on CM/ECF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?