Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Barbosa

Filing 4

Order Remanding Case to State Court, denying 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jorge Barbosa. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 11/29/2012. (rss)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 12-62353-Civ-SCOLA
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JORGE BARBOSA,
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
ORDER REMANDING CASE
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Jorge Barbosa’s “Motion For Civil
[Contempt]/Enforcement To Stop An [Illegal] Eviction,” (ECF No. 1). It appears from the Civil
Cover Sheet (ECF No. 1-1), that Barbosa is attempting to remove his pending state court action
to this Court. Accordingly, this Court has construed Barbosa’s filing as a notice of removal.
Barbosa appears to be asserting that his state court action should be removed to federal court
because his federal constitutional rights have been violated by the state court judge. Although
not completely clear, it seems that Barbosa is seeking a stay of his eviction proceedings which
are pending in state court.
A defendant or defendants desiring to remove any civil action from a State court
shall file in the district court of the United States for the district and division
within which such action is pending a notice of removal signed pursuant to Rule
11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and containing a short and plain
statement of the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all process,
pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or defendants in such action.
28 U.S.C. § 1446(a) (2006).
Here, Barbosa’s notice of removal fails to provide a short and plain statement of the
grounds for removal. Based on Barbosa’s filings, it is not clear that this Court has jurisdiction
over this matter, or that this matter is otherwise subject to removal.

Additionally, under

traditional abstention doctrines, federal courts generally avoid interfering with ongoing state
court judicial proceedings. See, e.g., Shapiro v. Ingram, 207 F. App’x 938 (11th Cir. 2006).
For these reasons, it is ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED, and the Clerk shall
CLOSE this case. The Clerk shall take all necessary steps to ensure the prompt remand of this
action and transfer this file back to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and
for Broward County, Florida. Relatedly, Barbosa’s application to proceed without prepaying
fees or costs (ECF No. 3) is DENIED, because the application is not signed.
DONE and ORDERED in chambers, at Miami, Florida, on November 29, 2012.

___________________________________
ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to:
Jorge Barbosa, pro se