Termilus v. Marksman Security Corporation

Filing 29

ORDER granting 21 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 3/3/2016. (tro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-61758-CIV-MORENO/O'SULLIVAN SINDY TERMILUS, Plaintiff, vs. MARKSMAN SECURITY CORPORATION, Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents (DE # 21, 2/5/16). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part: Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of law no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion. Failure to do so may be deemed sufficient cause for granting the motion by default. (Emphasis supplied). Having received no response from the plaintiff, and a response having been due, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents (DE # 21, 2/5/16) is GRANTED in accordance with this Order. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before March 14, 2016, the plaintiff shall provide the defendant with a written response to, and produce the documents responsive to the subject Request for Production. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before March 14, 2016, the plaintiff shall provide answers to the subject interrogatories. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 3rd day of March, 2015. JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies to: U.S. District Judge Moreno All counsel of record Sindy Termilus, pro se 4055 Tree Tops Road Cooper City, Fl 33026

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?