Termilus v. Marksman Security Corporation
Filing
29
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 3/3/2016. (tro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 15-61758-CIV-MORENO/O'SULLIVAN
SINDY TERMILUS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MARKSMAN SECURITY CORPORATION,
Defendant.
______________________________/
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Compel
Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents (DE # 21, 2/5/16). Rule
7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida provides, in pertinent part:
Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of
law no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion. Failure to
do so may be deemed sufficient cause for granting the motion by
default. (Emphasis supplied).
Having received no response from the plaintiff, and a response having been due,
it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant’s Motion to Compel Answers to
Interrogatories and Production of Documents (DE # 21, 2/5/16) is GRANTED in
accordance with this Order. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before March 14, 2016, the plaintiff shall
provide the defendant with a written response to, and produce the documents
responsive to the subject Request for Production. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before March 14, 2016, the plaintiff shall
provide answers to the subject interrogatories.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 3rd day of March,
2015.
JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies to:
U.S. District Judge Moreno
All counsel of record
Sindy Termilus, pro se
4055 Tree Tops Road
Cooper City, Fl 33026
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?