Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. v. 17 No.1-Own et al

Filing 44

Final Default Judgment And Permanent Injunction. Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 42) is granted. DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. against 17 No.1-Own, 2KS96jkx0, 8jdsa7qiw, 9ish45DH, A KissMe, Albert F rench TCSP, Andres Hanson Escabias, Andy Wordsworth, Butler LUW, CALL ME J, CHELLE GRE, Cannot Help, DONGLE RENKESON, DaviRichardson, Dong Hui Store, Edwin ROBERSON, Forda Zarva, GTILO, GinaSoninc, IAN & ADAM, IdealLife, JANICE WILSON, James Parrish, Jorden Smither Happyshopping, KHarrisn, KT365-CD, Laterwwr, Lorena Martinezas, M&SDTing, Maisie Tighe, Mike DavisAS, Miki Minami, NICOlE MUNFORD, OOPLSMS, Patricia Bierley, Pippa Reeve, Sarah Hamilton a, Slate GXKL, Super Spowerful, Susueky, TEVEN&O RTI, Tankoo, Tran GO, Wayne Webber, YOU-SKTI, ZHJDLKS ZZ, ZMYOPI, brosin, cooperatomlggwau, crutchleanrxmno, da Ar, duroseaumfkrjbn, jun yu luo, lili liu, linqingquan, michale mcgee, renceburg, renjijuanndhnp, sam717, typewriter to, zenicham. Defendants, the Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A terminated. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 8/30/2017. (kpe)

Download PDF
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc., Plaintiff, v. 17 No.1-Own, and others, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 17-61201-CIV-SCOLA Final Default Judgment And Permanent Injunction This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 42). The Plaintiff has moved for a default judgment consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). Previously, the Clerk of the Court entered a default under Rule 55(a) (ECF No. 36). “A defendant, by his default, admits the plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations of fact,” as set forth in the operative complaint. Eagle Hosp. Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1307 (11th Cir. 2009). “Even when a default judgment is warranted based on a party's failure to defend, the allegations in the complaint with respect to the amount of damages are not deemed true. The district court must instead conduct an inquiry in order to ascertain the amount of damages with reasonable certainty.” Almeira v. GB House, LLC, No. 14–cv–00045, 2014 WL 1366808, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2014) (quoting In re Catt, 368 F.3d 789, 793 (7th Cir. 2004)). An evidentiary hearing on damages is unnecessary as long as “the amount claimed is liquidated or capable of ascertainment from definite figures contained in the documentary evidence or in detailed affidavits.” Dundee Cement Co. v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Prods., Inc., 722 F.2d 1319, 1323 (7th Cir. 1983); see also S.E.C. v. Smyth, 420 F.3d 1225, 1231, 1232 n.13 (11th Cir. 2005). The Court has carefully reviewed the Plaintiff’s motion, the record, and the relevant legal authorities. Accordingly, it is ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 42) is granted. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. [“Plaintiff”), and against Defendants, the Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule “A” hereto (collectively “Defendants”), on all Counts of the Complaint as follows: 1. Permanent Injunctive Relief: Defendants and their officers, agents, representatives, servants, employees and attorneys, and all persons acting in concert and participation with them are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from: a. manufacturing or causing to be manufactured, importing, advertising, or promoting, distributing, selling or offering to sell counterfeit and infringing goods using Plaintiff’s trademarks identified in Paragraph 14 of the Complaint and Schedule “B” attached thereto (the “Specialized Marks”); b. using the Specialized Marks in connection with the sale of any unauthorized goods; c. using any logo, and/or layout which may be calculated to falsely advertise the services or products of Defendants offered for sale or sold via the Internet based e-commerce stores operating under their seller identification names identified on Schedule “A” hereto (the “Seller IDs”) and/or any other e-commerce store, seller identity, website or business, as being sponsored by, authorized by, endorsed by, or in any way associated with Plaintiff; d. falsely representing themselves as being connected with Plaintiff, through sponsorship or association; e. engaging in any act which is likely to falsely cause members of the trade and/or of the purchasing public to believe any goods or services of Defendants offered for sale or sold via the Seller IDs and/or any other e-commerce store, seller identity, website or business, are in any way endorsed by, approved by, and/or associated with Plaintiff; f. using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the Specialized Marks in connection with the publicity, promotion, sale, or advertising of any goods sold by Defendants via the Seller IDs and/or any other e-commerce store, seller identity, website or business; g. affixing, applying, annexing or using in connection with the sale of any goods, a false description or representation, including words or other symbols tending to falsely describe or represent goods offered for sale or sold by Defendants via the Seller IDs and/or any other e-commerce store, seller identity, website or business, as being those of Plaintiff or in any way endorsed by Plaintiff; h. otherwise unfairly competing with Plaintiff; i. using the Specialized Marks, or any confusingly similar trademarks, on e-commerce marketplace sites, from use on any webpage (including as the title of any web page), from any advertising links to other websites, from search engines’ databases or cache memory, and from any other form of use of such terms which is visible to a computer user or serves to direct computer searches to Internet based e-commerce store website businesses registered by, owned, or operated by Defendants, including the ecommerce stores operating under all of the Seller IDs; and j. effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations or utilizing any other device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth above. 2. Additional Equitable Relief: The Plaintiff is additionally entitled to the following equitable relief: a. Upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Internet marketplace website operators and/or administrators for the Seller IDs, including but not limited to Amazon.com, Inc., shall disable and/or cease facilitating access to the Seller IDs, including any other alias seller identification names being used and/or controlled by Defendants to engage in the business of marketing, offering to sell, and/or selling goods bearing counterfeits and infringements of the Specialized Marks; b. Upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Internet marketplace website operators and/or administrators, including but not limited to Amazon.com, Inc., shall permanently remove any and all listings and associated images of goods bearing counterfeits and/or infringements of the Specialized Marks via the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller IDs and any other alias seller identification names being used and/or controlled by Defendants to promote, offer for sale and/or sell goods bearing counterfeits and/or infringements of the Specialized Marks; and c. Upon the Plaintiff’s request, any Internet marketplace website operators and/or administrators, including but not limited to Amazon.com, Inc., shall permanently cease fulfillment of and sequester all goods of each Defendant bearing one or more of the Specialized Marks in its inventory, possession, custody, or control, and surrender those goods to the Plaintiff. 3. Statutory damages in favor of the Plaintiff pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) are determined to be $1,000,000.00 against each Defendant, for which sum let execution issue. The awarded amount falls within the permissible statutory range under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c). 4. All funds currently restrained by Amazon Payments, Inc. (“Amazon”) pursuant to the temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in this action, are to be immediately (within 5 business days) transferred to the Plaintiff in partial satisfaction of the monetary judgment entered herein against each Defendant. Amazon shall provide to the Plaintiff at the time the funds are released, a breakdown reflecting the (i) total funds restrained in this matter per Defendant; (ii) the total chargebacks, refunds, and/or transaction reversals deducted from each Defendant’s funds restrained prior to release; and (iii) the total funds released per Defendant to the Plaintiff. 5. Interest from the date this action was filed shall accrue at the legal rate. See 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 6. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Judgment and permanent injunction. 7. This case shall remain open as to Defendants huanyuanda (Defendant Number 26), KEKEHOT (Defendant Number 35), Leigh E Pickens (Defendant Number 40), NANSMBIR (Defendant Number 49), patti Kiser (Defendant Number 53), QIWUEYR (Defendant Number 55), and RIZIXUANG (Defendant Number 58), ONLY, until further Order of the Court. Done and ordered in chambers at Miami, Florida, on August 30, 2017. ________________________________ Robert N. Scola, Jr. United States District Judge SCHEDULE “A” DEFENDANTS BY NUMBER AND SELLER ID AND ASSOCIATED SELLER ID NUMBER Defendant Defendant / Seller ID Number 1 17 No.1-Own Amazon Seller ID A2M8QWPMHSF7Z1 2 2KS96jkx0 A3EQ3KO4RB68YB 3 8jdsa7qiw A1Z6BL9SCC50J0 4 9ish45DH A1CLEYDU4NWO7P 5 A KissMe A2SI6DOPZGUZFT 6 Albert French TCSP A11C8X45OUH6T4 7 Andres Hanson Escabias A2NH4KB152RD6Q 8 Andy Wordsworth A1KGABAJZY7J3I 9 brosin A16KAGTKU3GK1G 10 Butler LUW A281DXQZQEP5IH 11 CALL ME J A3HBS9Y50RTYE6 12 Cannot Help A25ND5CWAR6S50 13 CHELLE GRE A2U2JM8D6WEC5A 14 cooperatomlggwau A3AX8W1NUGGI8I 15 crutchleanrxmno AFG1873D7HM7F 16 da Ar AQR1FJ7FSDRDK 17 DaviRichardson A1E6P5XGO0OU3B 18 Dong Hui Store A3SVESG4LDBTXK 19 DONGLE RENKESON AAM6ZFZ44EK36 20 duroseaumfkrjbn AT7IDX0VP1LC4 21 Edwin ROBERSON A13E432VB4S00B 23 Forda Zarva A1SBYT3EEC4T8C 24 GinaSoninc AGSK4JIF2G6V3 25 GTILO A3DF42A5HOQ9NN 27 IAN & ADAM A30DRT6QG4QJPE 28 IdealLife 28 Ideal Life(10-15 Days Delivery) 29 James Parrish ADC963TU18BGZ 30 JANICE WILSON A1BC6SM5DFP5P8 A12SNQ85RNL7BP 31 Jorden Smither Happyshopping A32ATZTIEB857R 33 jun yu luo A37WZCRNGM3DF6 37 KHarrisn A136IM4T2NDARV 38 KT365-CD A12SDQPCXKESY4 39 Laterwwr A3W3XLMOWC1RZQ 41 lili liu A1QU9M2QRI0AB6 42 linqingquan A1JEIJ6SA6KILP 43 Lorena Martinezas A1PB7CEJLWBZXR 44 M&SDTing A156ACA5RSP5FL 45 Maisie Tighe A8PPIFU8KOGOS 46 michale mcgee ARX8WPQ8WW7GM 47 Mike DavisAS A1V5PTEXL02SEN 48 Miki Minami A2360FOU2ZYST4 50 NICOlE MUNFORD A149B7A3CT8Y1O 51 OOPLSMS A1R17GKEKIV5SM 52 Patricia Bierley A2Z5YPCO6CRN95 54 Pippa Reeve A2HHFXOH679ESL 56 renceburg AQWFBMQOS0I7B 57 renjijuanndhnp A2JGFUFUHZ3A9N 59 sam717 A3MDCHCMPYX4JA 60 Sarah Hamilton a A3VW0LX286SH27 61 Slate GXKL A3559O4181KPQ5 62 Super Spowerful A241NEIS2LXPNM 63 Susueky AQ058GPK2Z673 64 Tankoo A31HLWAD0EYJPF 65 TEVEN&ORTI A3NAQTD3Z8AS3E 66 Tran GO A3DQOMCMFOJRD2 67 typewriter to A1YXFLSJC8W07U 69 Wayne Webber A3JJ7VWSA2U3SG 70 Yinsoa Y A3JOI7BKFBLQQG 71 YOU-SKTI A1CKDKKM4S69AG 72 zenicham A1HA8BRA1GYQSU 73 ZHJDLKS ZZ A2SZ8EPRQ0JU3 74 ZMYOPI A2ZSKUMMH7K9B5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?