Louis Vuitton Malletier v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A
Filing
45
ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING 40 Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle's Report and Recommendation and GRANTING 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Final Default Judgment. The Court will separately enter Final Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 11/18/2022. See attached document for full details. (er01)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 22-60177-CIV-WILLIAMS
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER,
Plaintiff,
vs.
THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS
ENTITIES, AND UNINCORPORATED
ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED
ON SCHEDULE A,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle’s Report
and Recommendation (“Report”) on Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Default Judgment
(“Motion”) (DE 36) against Defendants. 1 (DE 40.) In the Report, Magistrate Judge Valle
recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion be GRANTED. Defendants filed no response to the
Motion. Additionally, the Parties did not file any objections to Judge Valle’s Report, and
the time period to file objections has passed.
The Defendants are the Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated
Associations identified on Schedule “A” to the Complaint (collectively “Defendants”).
Defendant nisaaccessories.com (Defendant Number 72) was dismissed from the case
and, therefore, is not included in the Motion. (See DE 21.) Further, Defendants
beyondfoot.com (Defendant Number 16), chrmyou.com (Defendant Number 22),
fullclothes.com (Defendant Number 33), and uppallrun.com (Defendant Number 97)
(together, the “Non-Answering Defendants”) are not included in the Motion.
1
In the Report, Judge Valle recommends permitting Plaintiff to (1) seek a Clerk’s default
as to the Non-Answering Defendants; and (2) supplement its Motion to include the NonAnswering Defendants. (DE 36 at 16.) On November 10, 2022, Plaintiff and the NonAnswering Defendants filed Agreed Motions for Entry of Consent Final Judgments and
Permanent Injunctions (“Agreed Motions”). (DE 41; DE 42.) Accordingly, Judge Valle’s
recommendations regarding the Non-Answering Defendants are moot.
Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law,
it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report (DE 40) is AFFIRMED AND
ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Default Judgment (DE 36) is GRANTED. The
Court will separately enter Final Default Judgment.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 18th day of
November, 2022.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?