Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow
Filing
51
ORDER granting 48 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 40 Amended Complaint Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Answer due 5/11/2007. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 4/16/07. (lk)
<![CDATA[
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow
Doc. 51
Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM
Document 51
Entered on FLSD Docket 04/16/2007
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 06-21748-CIV-MARTINEZ-BANDSTRA MARK J. GAINOR, Plaintiff, vs. SIDLEY, AUSTIN, BROWN & WOOD, LLP et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MERRILL LYNCH'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant Merrill Lynch's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint (D.E. No. 48). The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise duly advised. It is hereby: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that 1. Defendant Merrill Lynch's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint (D.E. No. 48) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant Merrill Lynch shall respond to the Amended Complaint on or before May 11, 2007. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, April 16, 2007.
____________________________________ JOSE E. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies provided to: Magistrate Judge Bandstra All Counsel of Record
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
