Riches v. Doe

Filing 3

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Jonathan Lee Riches, Recommending that this petition be dismissed for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Objections to R&R due by 1/23/2007. Signed by Judge Patrick A. White on 1/8/07. (br)

Download PDF
Riches v. Doe Doc. 3 Case 1:07-cv-20042-FAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2007 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 07-20042-CIV-MORENO MAGISTRATE P. A. WHITE JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. GOVERNMENT SNITCHES AND INFORMANTS INC.,etc all : : : : REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. : ______________________________ The plaintiff, Jonathan Lee Riches, currently detained at the Federal Correctional Institution, in Salters, South Carolina, filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983.(DE#1) The plaintiff claims that Government Snitches and Informants Inc. is a secret organization based in Miami, Florida, whose members includes President Bush and Gangs from Hong Kong etc. He claims they are responsible for multiple criminal acts, including, but not limited to genocide, war crimes, piracy, slavery, injury to wildlife, threatening the president, etc. They have placed computer chips and parasites in his brain. The plaintiff is seeking monetary damages of over 429 trillion dollars. The plaintiff further seeks a restraining order against the defendants, and "air force one" (complaint pg. Pgs 1-3). The plaintiff has failed to state a claim. The plaintiff names as defendants "Government Snitches and Informants Inc.", a defendant not amenable to suit, and raises non-cognizable, frivolous claims. II. Analysis Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-20042-FAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2007 Page 2 of 3 As follows: amended, 28 U.S.C. 1915 reads in pertinent part as Sec. 1915 Proceedings in Forma Pauperis * * * (e)(2) Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that -* * * (B) the action or appeal -* * * (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted;... This is a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Such actions require the deprivation of a federally protected right by a person acting under color of state law. 758 F.2d 1416, 1419 (11 Cir. 1985). It is therefore recommended that this complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e)(2)(B) (ii). Objections to this report may be filed with the District Judge within ten days of receipt of a copy of the report. See 42 U.S.C. 1983; Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312 (1981); Whitehorn v. Harrelson, 2 Case 1:07-cv-20042-FAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2007 Page 3 of 3 Dated this 8th day of January, 2007. ______________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE cc: Jonathan Lee Riches, Pro Se Reg#40948-018 FCI- Williamsburg Po Box 340 Salters, SC 29590 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?