Thompson v. The Florida Bar

Filing 107

Plaintiff's MOTION for clarification Re Proper Parties by John B. Thompson. Responses due by 9/26/2007 (Thompson, John)

Thompson v. The Florida Bar

Doc. 107

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JOHN B. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. THE FLORIDA BAR and DAVA J. TUNIS, Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION COMES NOW plaintiff, John B. Thompson, hereinafter Thompson, as an attorney on his own behalf, and respectfully seeks clarification from the court and from the parties, by way of this motion, stating: 1. Plaintiff should like to know from the court, if possible, and from the parties, if the proper parties have been sufficiently named herein for purposes of the relief plaintiff seeks. A reading of Fieger v. Michigan Supreme Court raises the possibility that maybe the Florida Supreme Court and/or its Chief Justice and Justices should be sued as well. 2. The last thing plaintiff wants to do is inconvenience the court and the parties with a hearing on his preliminary injunction and not have the proper parties involved. Thompson thinks the parties already named are sufficient, but he does not want to be "sandbagged" on this issue, so he invites comment, in this regard, through this means, since counsel for the parties will not communicate with Thompson by normal means. I HEREBY CERTIFY that this has been served upon record counsel this 12th day of September, 2007, electronically. Case No. 07-21256 (Judge Adalberto Jordan)

1
Dockets.Justia.com

/s/ JOHN B. THOMPSON, Plaintiff Attorney, Florida Bar #231665 1172 South Dixie Hwy., Suite 111 Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Phone: [phone] [e-mail]

2