Thompson v. The Florida Bar

Filing 117

ORDER denying 84 Motion for Leave to File, denying as moot 86 Motion for Clarification, denying 91 Motion for Leave to File, denying 92 Motion for Leave to File, denying 96 Motion for Leave to File, denying 100 Motion for Leave to File, denying 102 Motion for Leave to File, denying 104 Motion for Leave to File, denying 107 Motion for Clarification, denying 111 Motion for Leave to File, denying 112 Motion for Leave to File, denying 114 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 9/19/07. (lh)

Download PDF
Thompson v. The Florida Bar Doc. 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 07-21256-CIV-JORDAN JOHN B. THOMPSON ) ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) ) THE FLORIDA BAR, et al ) Defendants ) ____________________________________ ) ORDER Mr. Thompson's pending motions for leave to file various documents [D.E. 84, 91, 92, 96, 100, 102, 104, 111, 112, 114] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The only pleading pending before the court right now is Mr. Thompson's third amended complaint, and there is no need for the court to consider any additional documents at this time. If Mr. Thompson wants to submit documents in support of any future motion, he should submit them all at once as an appendix to his motion. Mr. Thompson's first motion for clarification [D.E. 86] is DENIED AS MOOT, since the court has already granted leave to amend to file a third amended complaint. Mr. Thompson's second motion for clarification [D.E. 107] is DENIED . It is not a proper role for the court to advise Mr. Thompson as to the propriety of the named plaintiffs. Moreover, the court has already given Mr. Thompson several opportunities to amend his complaint and name the proper parties. DONE and ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida, this 19th day of September, 2007. _______________________ Adalberto Jordan United States District Judge Copy to: All counsel of record Dockets.Justia.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?