Thompson v. The Florida Bar

Filing 370

SUPPLEMENT to 369 Plaintiff's MOTION to Vacate 368 Plaintiff's MOTION to Vacate 347 Order Dismissing Case Based Upon Newly Discovered Fraud by The Bar, 368 Plaintiff's MOTION to Vacate 347 Order Dismissing Case Based Upon Newly Discovered Fraud by The Bar (Can't ignore this one;) by John B. Thompson. (Thompson, John)

Thompson v. The Florida Bar

Doc. 370

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JOHN B. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. THE FLORIDA BAR and DAVA J. TUNIS, JOHN HARKNESS, AND FRANK ANGONES, Defendants. Case No. 07-21256 (Judge Adalberto Jordan)

SUPPLEMENT TO PLAINTIFF'S NEW AND VERIFIED MOTION TO VACATE ORDER ON THE BASIS OF THE FLORIDA BAR'S PATENT FRAUD COMES NOW petitioner, John B. Thompson, and hereby supplements his motion, pursuant to Rule 60 (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to vacate its order dismissing this cause of action because of newly discovered fraud stating: Fraud is a basis for vacating any judicial order, when a party benefiting from that order has engaged in fraud to procure it. The Bar repeatedly asserted to this court that it and its prosecutors bear no ill will toward Thompson. Now we all have proof to the contrary, as seen by the below:

John B. Thompson, Attorney at Law 1172 S. Dixie Hwy., Suite 111 Coral Gables, Florida 33146 305-666-4366 [e-mail]
December 7, 2007 Frank Angones Florida Bar President Miami, Florida Via Fax and e-mail

1
Dockets.Justia.com

Copy to All Florida Bar Governors via e-mail Re: Libel by Florida Bar and Its Prosecutor Barnaby Min Dear Frank and All Bar Governors: Your assistant Bar prosecutor Mr. Min has chosen to publish at the Justice Building Blog a false and defamatory statement that I read every word of every document into the record. The transcript proves this is not the case, and that this is a total fabrication by Mr. Min. This patently false assertion, as you can see by the attached, has understandably generated the response that I am a "nutcase" for doing such a thing. Min's nonprivileged comment shows not only the animus of The Bar collectively but also opens up The Bar to a libel action, which I intend to bring. As an aside, what is Mr. Min doing posting at a blog about a Bar target when he ought to be doing his job? It appears that publicly attacking me falsely is in fact part of his job. I hereby make a demand for a full apology, correction, and retraction under Florida statutory law, to run prominently in The Florida Bar News in its next issue, which I must approve ahead of time. Govern yourselves accordingly, which appears impossible given your institutional hatred of me and what I stand for. Regards, Jack Thompson
Rump, You asked about the Thompson trial before Judge Tunis. It is now week two. The Bar put on its case last week and rested. Thompson failed to participate in discovery and Judge Tunis entered an order precluding him from introducing any evidence. She is, however, allowing Thompson to testify. During the Bar's case, approximately 3,000 pages of his e-mails/letters/news announcements were introduced into evidence. Thompson has taken the stand and is reading every single word of every single page into the record. Judge Tunis is allowing Thompson to do so. When I watched the trial last week, everyday, Thompson filed a Motion to Recuse Judge Tunis. Each time, the motions were denied for being legally sufficient. I do not have the patience or time to sit and watch Thompson reading 3,000 pages into the record so I have not really paid any attention this week. I do know, however, that he is not yet half way through the documents so it will probably be another week.

2

Barnaby Min Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:42:00 AM

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19039943&postID=4139464104693836891 Anonymous said... Oh lord that is funny shit. Mr. Min Thank You for making my day and providing this tid bit: "Thompson has taken the stand and is reading every single word of every single page into the record. Judge Tunis is allowing Thompson to do so." It just does not get better than this! When all is said and done Judge Tunis should be praised for dealing with this nut case. Wednesday, December 05, 2007 4:20:00 PM From www.flabar.org: Miami Branch Chief Disciplinary Counsel: Arlene K. Sankel Suite M100, Rivergate Plaza 444 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131-2404 [phone] Circuits: 11, 16 Bar Counsel: Randi K. Lazarus, William Mulligan, Jennifer Falcone Moore,

Barnaby Lee Min and Margarita Cimadevilla

In point of fact, Thompson did at his trial what The Bar's own witnesses did: He read into the record only excerpts from certain documents into the record and commented

3

thereon. Mr. Min was at the proceedings very little. He has misrepresented, grossly, what transpired thereat, and he has, in doing so, revealed the animus and bad faith of The Bar in prosecuting Thompson. Mr. Min was the one who got this prosecutorial ball rolling in the Miami office. "Oh, what a wicked web we weave when first we purpose to deceive." The order dismissing the action must be vacated, and plaintiff moves the court to do so. Plaintiff asserted improper prosecutorial motive, animus, and misconduct. Min has proven it. I hereby certify that the foregoing has been provided to opposing counsel through the court's electronic filing system, this December 7, 2007.

/s/ JOHN B. THOMPSON, Plaintiff Attorney, Florida Bar #231665 1172 South Dixie Hwy., Suite 111 Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Phone: [phone] [e-mail]

4