Hernandez v. Internet Gaming Entertainment, Ltd et al

Filing 62

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report by Internet Gaming Entertainment, Ltd, IGE U.S. LLC. (Heywood, Samuel)

Download PDF
Hernandez v. Internet Gaming Entertainment, Ltd et al Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION Case No. 07-21403-CIV-COHN/SELTZER ANTONIO HERNANDEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarl y situated, Plaintiff, v. IGE U.S. LLC, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. _____________________________/ JOINT MOTION FOR BRIEF ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT Pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Antonio Hernandez ("Mr. Hernandez") and Defendant Affinity Media Holdings, LLC a/k/a IGE U.S. LLC ("IGE U.S.") (together, "the Parties") jointly move this Court for an order granting a brief, seven-day enlargement of time to file a Joint Status Report. Pursuant to Plaintiff 's Motion to Compel Answers to Request for Production and Interrogatories, and for extension of discovery limits [D.E. 58], this Court issued a July 7, 2008 Order [D.E. 61] requiring the Parties to confer on the issues raised by the motion and to file a Joint Status Report detailing the outcome of their meeting by 5 p.m. EST, July 11, 2008. The Parties are diligently pursuing settlement negotiations at this time. In view of those ongoing discussions, the Parties hereby jointly request a seven-day suspension of the deadline to file a Joint Status Report. Should such filing still be necessary, the Parties will comply no later {M2705497;1} Dockets.Justia.com than 5 p.m. EST, on July 18, 2008. The relief requested herein will prejudice neither party, but rather will facilitate the efficient disposition of this matter. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3 Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.A.3, undersigned counsel for IGE U.S. certifies that on July 11, 2008, he contacted Plaintiff 's counsel, Don Haviland, to confer in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised by this motion, and that Mr. Haviland agreed to the relief requested herein and agreed to file this motion jointly Dated: July 11, 2008 NEWSOME LAW FIRM 20 North Orange Avenue Suite 800 Orlando, Florida 32801 Tel. (407) 648-5977 Fax (407) 648-5252 email: newsome@newsomelaw.com THE HAVILAND LAW FIRM, LLC 740 South Third Street, 3rd Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19147 Tel. (215) 609-4661 Fax (215) 392-4400 email: haviland@havilandlaw.com By: /s/ C. Richard Newsome ______ C. Richard Newsome Florida Bar No. 827258 Donald E. Haviland, Jr. Pennsylvania Bar No. 66615 Attorneys for Plaintiff Antonio Hernandez AKERMAN SENTERFITT One S.E. 3rd Avenue, 25th Floor Miami, FL 33131-1714 Phone: (305) 374-5600 Fax: (305) 374-5095 Email: james.miller@akerman.com By: /s/ Samuel S. Heywood James M. Miller, Esq. Florida Bar Number: 201308 Samuel S. Heywood, Esq. Florida Bar Number: 0016604 Attorneys for Defendant IGE U.S. LLC {M2705497;1} CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that true and accurate copies of the foregoing was served by using the Southern District of Florida's CM/ECF system on July 11, 2008, on all counsel or parties of record on the attached service list. By: /s/ Samuel S. Heywood Samuel S. Heywood, Esq. {M2705497;1} SERVICE LIST Hernandez v. IGE U.S. LLC, Case No. 07-21403-CIV (COHN/SELTZER) C. Richard Newsome newsome@newsomelaw.com NEWSOME LAW FIRM 20 North Orange Avenue Suite 800 Orlando, Florida 32801 Tel. (407) 648-5977 Fax (407) 648-5252 Donald E. Haviland, Jr. haviland@havilandlaw.com THE HAVILAND LAW FIRM, LLC 740 South Third Street, 3rd Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19147 Tel. (215) 609-4661 Fax (215) 392-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiff Antonio Hernandez Attorneys for Defendant IGE U.S. LLC James M. Miller, Esq. james.miller@akerman.com Samuel S. Heywood samuel.heywood@akerman.com AKERMAN SENTERFITT One S.E. 3rd Avenue, 25th Floor Miami, FL 33131-1714 Tel. (305) 374-5600 Fax (305) 374-5095 {M2705497;1} {M2705497;1}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?