Watson v. Rochelle et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting 7 Preliminary Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge, recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint proceed as to claims of excessive force against Defendants Rochelle and Coventon. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 8/10/2009. (mhz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT S O U T H E R N DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C A S E NO. 09-21873-CIV-LENARD/WHITE G E O R G E WATSON, P l a in tif f , vs. C O I ROCHELLE, et al, Defendants. ________________________________/ O R D E R ADOPTING PRELIMINARY REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF M A G I S T R A T E JUDGE (D.E. 7) T H I S CAUSE is before the Court on the Preliminary Report and Recommendation o f the Magistrate Judge ("Preliminary Report," D.E. 7), issued on July 21, 2009, r e c o m m e n d in g that, after conducting an initial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, P la in tif f 's claims of excessive force against Defendants Rochelle and Conventon proceed. T h e re in , Defendants were provided ten (10) days to file objections to the Preliminary Report. T o date, Defendants have not filed any objections to the Report. Failure to timely file o b je c tio n s shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the rep o rt. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1 9 9 3 ). Therefore, after an independent review of the Preliminary Report and record, it is h e re b y ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. 2. T h e Preliminary Report of the Magistrate Judge (D.E. 7) is ADOPTED. P la in t if f ' s Complaint shall proceed as to the claims of excessive force against D e f e n d a n ts Rochelle and Conventon. D O N E AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 10th day of August, 2009. ___________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ J O A N A. LENARD U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?