Olem Shoe Corporation v. Washington Shoe Corporation

Filing 110

ORDER re 88 Plaintiff's MOTION TO COMMISSION A PERSON BEFORE WHOM DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS MAY BE TAKEN filed by Olem Shoe Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 6/18/2010. (tro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 09-23494-CV-HUCK/O'Sullivan Olem Shoe Corp., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. Washington Shoe Co., an Washington corporation, Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMMISSION A PERSON BEFORE WHOM DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN QUESTIONS MAY BE TAKEN This matter is before this Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Commission a Person Before Whom Deposition Upon Written Questions May Be Taken pursuant to Rule 28(b)(2) of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Clerk of this Court will issue a commission to Dongfang Liu for the taking of the deposition upon written questions of Su Yuan, of Haining Zhong Mei Specialized Printing Co., Ltd., Agricultural Development Zone, Haining City, China, authorizing him to take the testimony of Su Yuan in response to the written questions that have been compiled by Plaintiff and any crossquestions submitted by Defendant within 5 days from the date of this order. 2. The commission will direct that the testimony of the witness be reduced to writing, signed by the witness, and returned to this Court, together with the commission, by mail, with all convenient speed. 3. Plaintiff is ordered to pay all witness and translation fees incurred in connection with the execution of this commission. DONE AND ORDERED, in Chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 18th day of June, 2010. JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: United States District Judge Huck All Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?