Caton v. Pastrada et al
ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge, dismissing 8 Amended Complaint, denying as moot 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel, and closing case. Signed by Judge Joan A. Lenard on 2/26/2010. (mhz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT S O U T H E R N DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C A S E NO. 09-23733-CIV-LENARD/WHITE J A M E S R. CATON, P l a in tif f , vs. W A R D E N PASTRADA, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ________________________________/
O R D E R ADOPTING REPORT AND DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT T H I S CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report," D .E . 9) issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 2, 2010. On December 16, 2009, P la in tif f , acting pro se, filed the Complaint in this action. Plaintiff subsequently filed an a m e n d e d complaint ("Amended Complaint," D.E. 8) on January 6, 2010, pursuant to the M a g is tra te Judge's order. In his Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleges the Warden and o f f ic e rs at the Federal Correctional Center in Miami, Florida, denied him medical aid and p re s s u re d him into pleading guilty in a state court criminal case, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1 9 8 3 . Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that one officer incited inmates to attack him with glass a n d dried bleach and caused him to get into a fight. Furthermore, Plaintiff alleges the D e f en d a n ts knew he needed medical help but plotted to make him sick to cover for Officer R o c h e ' s hate crimes. T h e Report recommends Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28
U .S .C . § 1915(e)(2)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. On F eb rua ry 10, 2010, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes to be objections to the Report (" O b je c tio n s ," D.E. 10). Plaintiff's Objections simply repeat several of the allegations c o n ta in e d in his Amended Complaint. Also, on February 10, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel (D.E. 11), requesting the Court appoint counsel for him due to his p s yc h ia tric condition. P u r s u a n t to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), "[n]otwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion th e re o f , that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court d e ter m in e s that -- (A) the allegation of poverty is untrue; or (B) the action or appeal -- (i) is f riv o lo u s or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks m o n e ta ry relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief." 28 U.S.C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e )( 2 )( B ) . Accordingly, having conducted a de novo review of the Report, Objections, an d the record, and conducting an analysis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court f in d s that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be g ra n te d . It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. P lain tiff 's Amended Complaint (D.E. 8), filed on January 6, 2010, is D I S M I S S E D , for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 9 1 5 (e)(2)(B ); 2. P la in tif f 's Motion to Appoint Counsel (D.E. 11), filed on February 10, 2 0 1 0 , is DENIED AS MOOT;
T h is case is now CLOSED.
D O N E AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 26th day of February, 2010. ________________________________ J O A N A. LENARD U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?