Segal et al v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 27 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss 22 Amended Complaint for Improper Venue, or alternatively MOTION to Change Venue or, alternatively, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss 22 Amended Complaint for Improper Venue, or alternatively MOTION to Change Venue or, alternatively, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION ( Responses due by 8/2/2010); denying 27 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 7/23/2010. (tm)

Download PDF
Segal et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. Doc. 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 10-20718-Civ-COOKE-BANDSTRA ALBERT SEGAL, and MARIANNA CHAPAROVA, Plaintiffs vs. AMAZON.COM, INC., Defendant. ______________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT THIS MATTER is before me on the Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time and Opposed Motion to Exceed Page Limit in Responding to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. I have reviewed the motion, the record, and the relevant legal authorities. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs' Motion [ECF No. 27], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The request for an extension of time is granted; the Plaintiffs' must file their Response on or before August 2, 2010. The request to exceed the page limit is denied. DONE and ORDERED in chambers at Miami, Florida, this 23rd day of July 2010. Copies furnished to: Ted E. Bandstra, U.S. Magistrate Judge Counsel of record Albert Segal & Marianna Chaparova, pro se Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?