Romero et al v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER requiring response to 54 First MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by Non-Party Movant, A.C.S., Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 8/23/2011. (tro)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 10-21699-CIV-LENARD/O’SULLIVAN
RITZY ROMERO, RITZY ROMERO,
as mother and Representative of
LOURDES ROMERO and GABRIELA SMITH CRUZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
TOYOTA MOTORS CORPORATION,
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES CORPORATION,
USA, INC.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Non-Party Movant, A.C.S., Inc.’s Motion to
Quash Subpoena (DE # 54, 7/7/11). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part:
Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of law no
later than ten days after service of the motion as computed in the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure. Failure to do so may be deemed sufficient cause for
granting the motion by default. (Emphasis supplied).
Having received no response from the defendant, and a response having been due, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendant shall file a response to the Non-Party
Movant, A.C.S., Inc.’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (DE # 54, 7/7/11) on or before September 6,
2011. The failure to file a response may result in an Order granting the Non-Party Movant,
A.C.S., Inc.’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (DE # 54, 7/7/11) in its entirety.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 23rd day of
August, 2011.
___________________________________
JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies provided:
U.S. District Court Judge Lenard
All counsel on record