Samuel-Maxwell v. United States of America

Filing 12

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendations. Motion to Vacate DE 1 is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 4/12/2011. (lbc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-22069-CIV-UNGARO O’NEIL SAMUEL MAXWELL, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ______________________________/ ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed June 23, 2010. (D.E. 1.) THE COURT has reviewed the record as a whole and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Movant initially filed a Motion to Vacate with the assistance of counsel. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton. Thereafter, counsel withdrew from his representation of Movant and the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White, who, on March 16, 2010, issued a Report recommending that the Motion be dismissed for Movant’s lack of prosecution.1 (D.E. 11.) The parties were afforded the opportunity to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report; however, no objections were filed. The matter is now ripe for review. Accordingly, having conducted a careful, de novo review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report (D.E. 11) is 1 In his Report, the Magistrate Judge also notes that a search of the Bureau of Prisons website reveals that Movant was released from its custody on November 30, 2010. RATIFIED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The Motion to Vacate (D.E. 1) is DISMISSED. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, at Miami, Florida this 12th day of April, 2011. _______________________________ URSULA UNGARO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE copies provided: O’Neil Samuel Maxwell, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?