United States of America v. 236 Cartons Each Containing One Obsidian Monitor

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Motion for Forfeiture of Property and entry of Final Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 4/8/2011. (EGT)

United States of 1:10-cv-22083-EGT Each Containing One Obsidian Monitor Case America v. 236 Cartons Document 22-1 Entered on FLSD

Docket 04/04/2011 Page 1 of 3 Doc. 23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: 10-22083-CIV-TORRES CONSENT CASE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, vs. 236 CARTONS EACH CONTAINING ONE OBSIDIAN MONITOR, Defendants. _____________________________/ FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE AND ORDER CLOSING CASE This matter is before the Court upon the plaintiff United States' motion, pursuant to Rule 58(d), Fed.R.Civ.P., to enter a final judgment of forfeiture forfeiting to the United States the defendants 236 cartons each containing one Obsidian monitor with remote control and the Customs cost bond. The Court, having

reviewed the file and the pleadings in this matter, makes the following findings: 1. The United States and claimant Obsidian Electronics

Corp., have entered into a settlement agreement which has been filed of record. 2. 3. Publication has been duly made in this matter. No other claims have been filed of record.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 1:10-cv-22083-EGT Document 22-1

Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2011 Page 2 of 3

Based on the above findings, for good cause shown, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the matter, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. 2. The United States' motion is granted. Final judgment of forfeiture is hereby entered in favor

of the United States forfeiting the defendants 236 cartons each containing one Obsidian monitor with remote control and the five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) Customs cost bond to the United States. 3. Customs and Border Protection is hereby directed to

dispose of the property and the Customs cost bond in paragraph 2 according to law. 4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this cause to

enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ______ 8th day of April, 2011.

/s/

Edwin G. Torres

EDWIN G. TORRES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE cc: Antonia J. Barnes, AUSA Neil Mooney, Esq.

2