Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Filing
450
ORDER of DISMISSAL by USCA pursuant to Apppellant's motions to dismiss their respective appeals voluntarily with prejudice due to settlement, with costs and fees to be borne as agreed by the parties; re 389 Notice of Appeal, filed by Tom Blanchard, 398 Notice of Appeal, filed by Carla Victoria Diaz, 395 Notice of Appeal, filed by Laura Fortman, Douglas Paluczak, Chris Schulte, 392 Notice of Appeal,, filed by September Katje, Tom Blanchard, 404 Notice of Appeal, filed by Katie Sibley, 393 Notice of Appeal, filed by Steven Miller, 396 Notice of Appeal, filed by William H. McWhorter, 399 Notice of Appeal, filed by Margaret E. Wheeler, 401 Notice of Appeal, filed by Clark Hampe. USCA# 11-14538-AA (mc)
Case: 11-14538
Date Filed: 05/10/2012
Page: 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 10 2012
ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING
56 Forsyth Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
John Ley
Clerk of Court
For rules and forms visit
www.ca11.uscourts.gov
May 10, 2012
Steven M. Larimore
United States District Court
400 N MIAMI AVE
MIAMI, FL 33128-1807
Appeal Number: 11-14538-AA
Case Style: Thomas Blanchard, et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al
District Court Docket No: 1:10-cv-23235-WMH
The enclosed copy of this Court's Order of Dismissal is issued as the mandate of this court.
See 11th Cir. R. 41-4. Counsel and pro se parties are advised that pursuant to 11th Cir. R.
27-2, "a motion to reconsider, vacate, or modify an order must be filed within 21 days of the
entry of such order. No additional time shall be allowed for mailing."
Sincerely,
JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court
Reply to: Eleanor M. Dixon, AA/jsc
Phone #: (404) 335-6172
Enclosure(s)
DIS-4 Multi-purpose dismissal letter
1 of 3
Case: 11-14538
2 of 3
Date Filed: 05/10/2012
Page: 1 of 2
Case: 11-14538
3 of 3
Date Filed: 05/10/2012
Page: 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?