Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
Filing
466
MOTION to Dismiss Claimant from Case 276 Letter to the Court by Janet Sullivan by Janet Sullivan. Responses due by 11/23/2012 (ail)
District Court - Southern District of Flori
FL b P6
IED y
D.
c.
N 252 1
0#
92
STEVENM.L X RE
ARI
CL U S DI cT
ERK
ST
s. o #A -M/MI
o.f L
.
JntSlia Dr.
ae ulin
e
3080 Crestvvw
, #z2Z
'
Pre scott , A Z 8 630 1
- - -
Case : l:1O-cv-23235-WMH
#463
,-21
2
=
-
$ f/,.' y .
y zz
> zrr
.
X/8nrl P j A 8h *
'
z,/
FKCM // g.
'S 5VL
''vr
7a
-
G =rr r - -=
-
.>
N
.
2 pag es .
Thu Oct 25 11 :52 :18
IMPORTANT : REDACTION REQUIREMENTS
PRIVACY POLICY
A11 filings and attachments must comply with the redaction requirements in Fed .
R . Civ . P . 5.2 & Fed . R . Crim . P . 49.1 . Unless specifically exempted by the
rules or by court order, the personal identifiers noted below must be redacted
to show only the following :
Social Security number: last four digits only; taxpayer ID number : last four
digits only ; financial account numbers : last four digits only ; date of birth :
year only; minor 's name : initials only; home address ; city and state only
(for crim inal cases only).
It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to ensure the redaction
of personal identifiers . The Clerk 's Office will not review any document for
redaction purposes . Any personal information not otherwise protected will be made
available
the
* F o r th e c orp le te p r iva/y po .ics
n
2
1 g
A dm in ist ra t ive P roce du re s 1o cated
IMPORTANT : REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS AND CONTACT INFORMATIO
N
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2005-38, parties appearing pro se and counsel
appearing pro hac vice must file, in eaeh pending case, a notice of change of
mailing address or contact informatlon whenever such a change occurs. If court
notices sent via the U .S . mail are returned as undeliverab le TW ICE in a case,
notices w ill no longer be sent to that party until a current mailing address is
provided .
See reverse side
Subject :
Activity in Case 1:10-cv-23235-WMH Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase &
Co . et al Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system .
P lease DO NOT RESPON D to th is e-ma il be cause the m ail bo x i s u natt ended .
***N OTE TO PUB L IC AC CES S USER S *** Jud ic ial Co nfere nce o f the U nite d Sta tes
policy perlits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se
litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of al1 documents filed
e le ctron ical ly , i f rece ip t i s requ ired b y 1aw or d irecte d b y th e filer . PA CER
ac cess fees app ly t o a1 l othe r use rs . To avo id late r cha rges , down load a
copy of each document during this first viewing . However, if the
referenced document is a transcript , the free copy and 30 page limit do not app ly
U .S . District Court
southern District of Florida
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 10/25/2012 11 :46 AM EDT and filed
on 10/25/2012
Case Name : Kardonick v . JP Morgan Chase &
Ca se N um be r : 1 :10-cv -232 35-WM H
F ile r :
WA RN IN G : CA SE C LO SED
09/16/2011
Document Number : 463
( document attached)
No
Do cket Te xt :
ORDER granting (
462) Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply re (
462)
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to (
456) Defendant 's
MOTION for Order to Show Cause and Supporting Memorandum of Law ,
(460) Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Order on Motion for Leave to
File Excess Pages Replies due by 10/26/2012 . Signed by Senior Judge William
(
mno)
1 :l 0-cv -2 3235-W MH N otice ha s b een elect ronica lly ma iled t o :
A llan Ka nner
a .kanner@kanner-law .com , t .shuler@kanner-law .com
And rew Soukup
asoukup@cov .com
B rett Ceb u la sh
bcebulash@tcllaw .com
B rian T se-Hua Ku
brian@kumussman .com , louis@kumussman .com : reyna@kumussman .com,
sara@kumussman .com,
t .shuler@kanner-law .com, t .walker@kanner-law .com
Service
page
only
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?