Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 466

MOTION to Dismiss Claimant from Case 276 Letter to the Court by Janet Sullivan by Janet Sullivan. Responses due by 11/23/2012 (ail)

Download PDF
District Court - Southern District of Flori FL b P6 IED y D. c. N 252 1 0# 92 STEVENM.L X RE ARI CL U S DI cT ERK ST s. o #A -M/MI o.f L . JntSlia Dr. ae ulin e 3080 Crestvvw , #z2Z ' Pre scott , A Z 8 630 1 - - - Case : l:1O-cv-23235-WMH #463 ,-21 2 = - $ f/,.' y . y zz > zrr . X/8nrl P j A 8h * ' z,/ FKCM // g. 'S 5VL ''vr 7a - G =rr r - -= - .> N . 2 pag es . Thu Oct 25 11 :52 :18 IMPORTANT : REDACTION REQUIREMENTS PRIVACY POLICY A11 filings and attachments must comply with the redaction requirements in Fed . R . Civ . P . 5.2 & Fed . R . Crim . P . 49.1 . Unless specifically exempted by the rules or by court order, the personal identifiers noted below must be redacted to show only the following : Social Security number: last four digits only; taxpayer ID number : last four digits only ; financial account numbers : last four digits only ; date of birth : year only; minor 's name : initials only; home address ; city and state only (for crim inal cases only). It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to ensure the redaction of personal identifiers . The Clerk 's Office will not review any document for redaction purposes . Any personal information not otherwise protected will be made available the * F o r th e c orp le te p r iva/y po .ics n 2 1 g A dm in ist ra t ive P roce du re s 1o cated IMPORTANT : REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN CURRENT MAILING ADDRESS AND CONTACT INFORMATIO N Pursuant to Administrative Order 2005-38, parties appearing pro se and counsel appearing pro hac vice must file, in eaeh pending case, a notice of change of mailing address or contact informatlon whenever such a change occurs. If court notices sent via the U .S . mail are returned as undeliverab le TW ICE in a case, notices w ill no longer be sent to that party until a current mailing address is provided . See reverse side Subject : Activity in Case 1:10-cv-23235-WMH Kardonick v. JP Morgan Chase & Co . et al Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system . P lease DO NOT RESPON D to th is e-ma il be cause the m ail bo x i s u natt ended . ***N OTE TO PUB L IC AC CES S USER S *** Jud ic ial Co nfere nce o f the U nite d Sta tes policy perlits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of al1 documents filed e le ctron ical ly , i f rece ip t i s requ ired b y 1aw or d irecte d b y th e filer . PA CER ac cess fees app ly t o a1 l othe r use rs . To avo id late r cha rges , down load a copy of each document during this first viewing . However, if the referenced document is a transcript , the free copy and 30 page limit do not app ly U .S . District Court southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 10/25/2012 11 :46 AM EDT and filed on 10/25/2012 Case Name : Kardonick v . JP Morgan Chase & Ca se N um be r : 1 :10-cv -232 35-WM H F ile r : WA RN IN G : CA SE C LO SED 09/16/2011 Document Number : 463 ( document attached) No Do cket Te xt : ORDER granting ( 462) Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply re ( 462) MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to ( 456) Defendant 's MOTION for Order to Show Cause and Supporting Memorandum of Law , (460) Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages Replies due by 10/26/2012 . Signed by Senior Judge William ( mno) 1 :l 0-cv -2 3235-W MH N otice ha s b een elect ronica lly ma iled t o : A llan Ka nner a .kanner@kanner-law .com , t .shuler@kanner-law .com And rew Soukup asoukup@cov .com B rett Ceb u la sh bcebulash@tcllaw .com B rian T se-Hua Ku brian@kumussman .com , louis@kumussman .com : reyna@kumussman .com, sara@kumussman .com, t .shuler@kanner-law .com, t .walker@kanner-law .com Service page only

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?