Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
ORDER Requiring Response re 162 Notice (Other) filed by Apple, Inc., 168 Response/Reply (Other) filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc., ( Motions due by 11/7/2011). Signed by Judge Ursula Ungaro on 11/1/2011. (asl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Apple’s and Motorola’s Notices (D.E. 162,
165). The Court has reviewed said Notices, the relevant portions of the record, and is otherwise
fully advised in the premises.
In its Notice (D.E. 162), Apple indicates that it intends to file a motion to strike
Motorola’s supplemental infringement claims, prompting Motorola’s response (D.E. 165). The
Court is aware of the parties’ disagreement as articulated in their respective Notices. It is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that (1) Apple shall file said Motion to Strike by
November 7, 2011, or waive its stated objection. (2) In the interim, Motorola shall file by
November 4, 2011, its initial infringement claims, excluding the supplemental portions added
after the June 1, 2011, deadline mentioned in the parties’ Notices.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this _1st_ day of November,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
counsel of record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?