Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 223

REPLY to Response to Motion re 211 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Procedural Schedule to Serve Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit O, # 3 Exhibit P, # 4 Exhibit Q, # 5 Exhibit R)(Giuliano, Douglas)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT O UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable Paul J. Luckern Chief Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, PORTABLE MUSIC and DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, COMPUTERS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Investigation No. 337-TA-745 APPLE’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ITS NOTICE OF PRIOR ART TO ADD AN OMITTED REFERENCE AGAINST THE ’223 PATENT Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.15 and the Ground Rules in the above-captioned Investigation, Respondent Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby moves to supplement its notice of prior art to add a single prior art reference entitled “WBTPE: A Priority Ethernet LAN Protocol”, by M.S. Obaidat and D.L. Donahue, published in 1993 (“Obaidat”), attached hereto as Exhibit A. Good cause exists for Apple’s request because at the time Apple submitted its original prior art list, the existence, and therefore the significance and materiality of Obaidat, was unknown to Apple. Moreover, Motorola will not be prejudiced because its expert report on invalidity is not due until May 20, and Motorola thus will have sufficient time to respond to Apple’s contentions concerning Obaidat. Pursuant to Ground Rule 3(i), a separate memorandum of points and authorities is attached hereto. Pursuant to Ground Rule 3(ii), Apple contacted the Office of Unfair Import Investigations and counsel for Motorola concerning Apple’s motion. Staff stated that it would take a position after reviewing Apple’s motion. Motorola’s position was unavailable as of the time of this submission. Exhibit O Page 1 Exhibit O Page 2 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before the Honorable Paul J. Luckern Chief Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, PORTABLE MUSIC and DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, COMPUTERS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Investigation No. 337-TA-745 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ITS NOTICE OF PRIOR ART TO ADD AN OMITTED REFERENCE AGAINST THE ’223 PATENT Respondent Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby moves to supplement its notice of prior art to add a single prior art reference entitled “WBTPE: A Priority Ethernet LAN Protocol”, by M.S. Obaidat and D.L. Donahue, published in 1993 (“Obaidat”). Under the Procedural Schedule (Order No. 5), the identification of prior art upon which the parties will rely at the hearing was due just under three weeks ago on April 15. Since Apple submitted its notice of prior art, Apple continued to conduct prior art searches and analyze potential prior art, including up through the April 22 deadline for Motorola to provide its contention interrogatory responses concerning Apple’s invalidity defenses, and continuing through the preparation of initial expert reports due on May 6. The Obaidat reference was identified by prior art searchers after the April 15 deadline for Apple’s notice of prior art. Apple subsequently and promptly worked to analyze the relevancy of the reference to the asserted patents. Apple now moves to supplement its notice of prior art to identify a single prior art reference, Obaidat. Apple has promptly filed this motion upon its realization of the significance of Obaidat this week. Exhibit O Page 3 Exhibit O Page 4 Counsel for Respondent APPLE INC. -3Exhibit O Page 5 Exhibit A Exhibit O Page 6 Exhibit O Page 7 Exhibit O Page 8 Exhibit O Page 9 Exhibit O Page 10 Exhibit O Page 11 Exhibit O Page 12 Exhibit O Page 13 Exhibit O Page 14 Exhibit O Page 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?