Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
247
ORDER granting 224 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra on 2/24/2012. (yha)
UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI CO URT
CT
SO UTHERN DI
STRI O F FLO RI
CT
DA
CASE NO.1123580- VCI SCO LA/
BANDSTRA
M OTOROLA M O BI TY,I ,
LI
NC.
Fl itf,
ll n if
!
V.
APPLE I ,
NC.
Def
endant
.
/
APPLE I ,
NC.
Count cl m Pl ntf,
er ai ai if
M OTORO LA,I ,and
NC.
M OTO RO LA MO BI TY,I ,
LI
NC.
count cl m Def
er ai
endant
s.
/
ORDER
THI CAUSE came bef e t Cour onAppl I ' Moton t Com pel
S
or he
t
e nc.s
i o
Respons
es
t It r t i Regar n SetTopBoxPat t ( . 9- ( E. 4) i onJ ar
o n eroga or
es
dig ens Nos 1 22) D. 22 fl
ed anu y
31,2012.Upon r ew oft s m oton,t r
evi
hi
i he esponse and r y t et t coud fl and
epl her o, he
i
e
appl e l i i her
i
cabl aw, t s eby
O RDERED AND ADJUDG ED t Appl I ' Moton t Com pelResponses t
hat
e nc.s
i o
o
It r ga ore Re dig Se - Bo Pa en s (
nero t is gar n tTop x t t Nos.1 22)i GRANTED t t e exen
9- s
oh t t
t M ot ol shalsuppl entis answer t t
hat
or a
l
em
t
s o hese i erogat i by pr di aI nonnt r ores
ovi ng I
pr l
i eged i or aton I i t i STBS i ii i i i rngem ent cont i and
vi
nf m i i t o t
m ed
s
dentfed n t nfi
s
entons
l ied t cabl pr der t pr de M ot ol accus STBS t end user l so r i
i t o
m
e ovi s hat ovi
or a
ed
o
s. n
ul
ng,
t Coud fnds t t
he
i
hat hese i erogat i seek r evanti or aton butar overy br
nt r ores
el
nf m i
e
l oad.
Accor ngl M ot ol shalpr de issuppl ent r
di y, or a
l ovi t
em alespons t t
es o hese i erogat i as
nt r ores
so n r wed wi n t ( 0)da s o t e da e o t i Or .
aro
t en 1
hi
y f h t f hs der
f
u y,
DO NE AND O RDERED i Cham ber atMi i Fl i t s zh Y y o Febr ar
n
s,
am , orda hi
-
2012.
- - - -
,A
W G-- -
Ted E.Bands r
ta
Unied St es M agitat Judge
t
at
sr e
Copi f ni
es ur shed t
o:
Honor e Robed N .Scol
abl
a
Counselofr or
ec d
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?