Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 247

ORDER granting 224 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra on 2/24/2012. (yha)

Download PDF
UNI TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT SO UTHERN DI STRI O F FLO RI CT DA CASE NO.1123580- VCI SCO LA/ BANDSTRA M OTOROLA M O BI TY,I , LI NC. Fl itf, ll n if ! V. APPLE I , NC. Def endant . / APPLE I , NC. Count cl m Pl ntf, er ai ai if M OTORO LA,I ,and NC. M OTO RO LA MO BI TY,I , LI NC. count cl m Def er ai endant s. / ORDER THI CAUSE came bef e t Cour onAppl I ' Moton t Com pel S or he t e nc.s i o Respons es t It r t i Regar n SetTopBoxPat t ( . 9- ( E. 4) i onJ ar o n eroga or es dig ens Nos 1 22) D. 22 fl ed anu y 31,2012.Upon r ew oft s m oton,t r evi hi i he esponse and r y t et t coud fl and epl her o, he i e appl e l i i her i cabl aw, t s eby O RDERED AND ADJUDG ED t Appl I ' Moton t Com pelResponses t hat e nc.s i o o It r ga ore Re dig Se - Bo Pa en s ( nero t is gar n tTop x t t Nos.1 22)i GRANTED t t e exen 9- s oh t t t M ot ol shalsuppl entis answer t t hat or a l em t s o hese i erogat i by pr di aI nonnt r ores ovi ng I pr l i eged i or aton I i t i STBS i ii i i i rngem ent cont i and vi nf m i i t o t m ed s dentfed n t nfi s entons l ied t cabl pr der t pr de M ot ol accus STBS t end user l so r i i t o m e ovi s hat ovi or a ed o s. n ul ng, t Coud fnds t t he i hat hese i erogat i seek r evanti or aton butar overy br nt r ores el nf m i e l oad. Accor ngl M ot ol shalpr de issuppl ent r di y, or a l ovi t em alespons t t es o hese i erogat i as nt r ores so n r wed wi n t ( 0)da s o t e da e o t i Or . aro t en 1 hi y f h t f hs der f u y, DO NE AND O RDERED i Cham ber atMi i Fl i t s zh Y y o Febr ar n s, am , orda hi - 2012. - - - - ,A W G-- - Ted E.Bands r ta Unied St es M agitat Judge t at sr e Copi f ni es ur shed t o: Honor e Robed N .Scol abl a Counselofr or ec d

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?