Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 249

NOTICE by Apple, Inc. of Filing of Exhibits to Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Apple Inc.'s Motion to Compel Motorola to Provide Timely Depositions Concerning The Accused Set-Top Boxes (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit S, # 19 Exhibit T, # 20 Exhibit U, # 21 Exhibit V, # 22 Exhibit W, # 23 Exhibit X, # 24 Exhibit Y)(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT L

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Marshall Searcy <[e-mail]>
Friday, February 10, 2012 2:00 PM
Schmidt, Jill; David Perlson; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): individual depositions

Hi Jill, 
The individuals you have asked about are still employed by Motorola and we are inquiring into their available dates, as 
well as any additional availability for Mr. Schladt. 

From: Schmidt, Jill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 9:13 AM
To: Marshall Searcy; David Perlson; Moto-Apple-SDFL
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): individual depositions

Hi Marshall, 

Please let me know whether Motorola intends to call any of the other individuals listed in its initial disclosures at trial 
and, if so, please provide deposition dates.  In addition, please answer my question with regard to whether Chuck 
Supinski, Joe Murray, Mike DiFiglia, Lou Fodor, Nathan Mengel, and Scott Sellers are still employed by Motorola.  If they 
are, we would like to depose them even if Motorola does not intend to call them at trial. 

In addition, please let me know if Greg Schladt is available any earlier than March 7.  Since Judge Scola has set a tutorial 
for March 8‐9, March 7 will be very difficult for us. 

Thanks, 
Jill 

From: Schmidt, Jill
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:34 AM
To: Marshall Searcy ([e-mail]); David Perlson ([e-mail]); MotoApple-SDFL ([e-mail])
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): individual depositions 

Hi Marshall, 

On January 18, you said you expected to provide deposition dates for Motorola's 30(b)(6) designees on Topics 59‐62 
"early next week."  On January 27, that became "very shortly."  I have been asking you to identify Motorola's witnesses 
and deposition dates for those specific topics since December 9, yet you continue to ignore my requests.  While I 
appreciate that it takes time to coordinate everyone's schedules, Motorola has been dragging its feet on providing 
depositions of its technical witnesses for almost two months now, which is severely hampering Apple's ability to prepare 
its case.  We need to know who these witnesses are, whether their document production is complete, and when they 
are available for deposition.  Please provide this information by the end of the day. 

In addition, if Chuck Supinski, Joe Murray, Mike DiFiglia, Lou Fodor, Nathan Mengel, and Scott Sellers are still employed 
by Motorola, please provide deposition dates as soon as possible.  If not, please let me know if Quinn represents them. 

1

Thank you, 
Jill 

From: Schmidt, Jill
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 3:59 PM
To: Marshall Searcy ([e-mail]); David Perlson ([e-mail]); MotoApple-SDFL ([e-mail])
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): individual depositions 

Hi Marshall / David,  

Please provide deposition dates before March 1 for the witnesses below or let me know when you are available to meet 
and confer tomorrow. 

Best regards, 
Jill 

Jill Schmidt (née Ho)

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
[e-mail]
[phone] Direct
[phone] Fax 

From: Schmidt, Jill
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:11 AM
To: Marshall Searcy ([e-mail]); David Perlson ([e-mail]); MotoApple-SDFL ([e-mail])
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): individual depositions 

Hi Marshall / David, 

Please respond to my email and let me know when these individuals are available for deposition.  We are also still 
waiting for Motorola to designate technical witnesses for Topics 59‐62 of Apple's 30(b)(6) notice. 

Thanks, 
Jill 

Jill Schmidt (née Ho)

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
[e-mail]
[phone] Direct
[phone] Fax 
2

From: Ho, Jill
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:20 PM
To: Marshall Searcy ([e-mail]); David Perlson ([e-mail]); MotoApple-SDFL ([e-mail])
Cc: Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External; [e-mail]
Subject: Apple/Motorola (FL): individual depositions 

Hi Marshall / David, 

I write to follow up on this question from my November 16, 2011 letter to your former colleague, Ben Quarmby.  Please 
let me know whether Motorola intends to call to trial any of the following witnesses listed in its initial disclosures:  Kirk 
Dailey, Chris Collins, Peter Prunuske, Marjorie Silha, Steven Fischer, David Briggs, Jeanette Orlen, Gregory Schladt, Paul 
Martinson, Warren Fernandez, Jim Conroy, Amy Verbeke, Gunjan Shah, Sandy Baek, Jaime Wheeler, Allison Yi, Jeff 
Snow, Lawrence Robinson, John Kamieniecki, Richard Rementilla, Robert Simons, and John Tracy.  If so, please provide 
deposition dates for those witnesses immediately. 

In addition, it appears that Chuck Supinski, Joe Murray, Mike DiFiglia, Lou Fodor, Nathan Mengel, and Scott Sellers may 
have knowledge regarding  Motorola's testing of IPGs/EPGs on its set‐top boxes.  Please let me know if these individuals 
are still employed by Motorola and, if not, whether Quinn represents them. 

Thanks, 
Jill 

Jill Ho

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
[e-mail]
[phone] Direct
[phone] Fax 

The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, [e-mail],
and destroy the original message. Thank you.

3