Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 289

ORDER Granting 260 Motion to Compel Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra on 3/28/2012. (ar2)

UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI CO URT
CT
SO UTHERN DI
STRI OF FLORI
CT
DA
CASE NO.1023580- VCl SCO LN BANDSTRA

M OTOROLA M O BI TY,I ,
LI
NC.
Pl ntf,
ai i
f

APPLE I ,
NC.
Def
endant
.

/

APPLE I .
NC ,
Count cl m Pl ntf,
er ai ai i
f

M oToRo> ,I
Nc. and

Mo-oRou MOBiIY,Nc.
r A
LT I ,
Count cl m Def
er ai
endant
s.
/

O RDER

THI CAUSE c be or t eCou t Mo or a' Mo i t Comp Rul 3 b)6)
S
ame f e h
r on t ol s ton o
el e 0( (
Depost Tes i o fom Appl ( E.
ion t ny r
i
m
e D. 260)fld on Marh 9, 2.Upo r iw oft s
i
e
c 201
n eve
hi
m oton,t r
i he esponse and r y t et t coud fl and appl e I ,i i her
epl her o, he
i
e
i
cabl aw t s eby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED t atMo or a' Mo i t CompelRul 30( )6)
h
t ol s ton o
e b(
Deposii Testm onyfom Appl i G RANTED,he Coud fndi t r
ton
i
r
es
t
i ng he eques ed di
t
scover
y
i r evantand r
s el
easonabl I y t l t t di
yi
kel o ead o he scover ofadm i bl evi e. Ata
y
ssi e denc
m i m um ,t di
ni
he scover sought i r
y
s easonabl si i t t f i ii accused i
y m l o he unctonal es
ar
t
n
Mot ol s pr i i y i rngem entcont i
or a' el nar nf i
m
entons. Accor ngl A ppl shal pr
di y,
e
l oduce Rul
e

#

3 b ( wi es eswi k wl r ar n t e- l t ia i f nci f i 5an
0( )6) t s
n
t no edge eg dig he maino ic t u ton orOS
h
f on
d
t sour code f t webmaif i iy ofAppl s accused M obi e pr
he
ce
or he
l unctonal
t
e'
l
eM
oductwihi
tn

t ( 0)da s o t e dat oft i Or oras o h wie agr ed byt pa es.
en 1
y fh
e hs der
t er s
e
he di

DONEANDORDERED i Ch er a MimiFl iat szq a o Marh, 2.
n amb s, t a , or hi x y f c 201
d

R AW .- -Q=
Ted E.Bands r
ta
Unied St es M agitat Judge
t
at
sr e
Copi f ni
es ur shed t
o:
Honor e Rober N.Scol
abl
t
a
Counselofr
ecor
d